Since 2004, an employer is required to conduct a utilization review (UR) in order to dispute a request for medical treatment. Under the current law, if an injured worker challenges a UR determination to deny or modify a request for treatment, the worker must request an independent medical review (IMR) from an organization contracted by the administrative director. If, however, the UR determination is untimely, it is not subject to an IMR. Instead, the determination of medical necessity may be made by the WCAB. (Dubon v. World Restoration, Inc. (2014) 79 CCC 1298 (WCAB en banc).) So, it's crucial for employers to conduct their URs in a timely manner.
Are Saturdays Business Days for the Purposes of Utilization Review?
Topics: Case Law Updates
To keep Sullivan on Comp up to date on a monthly basis, our team dives into each panel decision and new laws to include an explanation of how each case fits within the workers' compensation scheme. Below is a sampling of this month's updates. Complete discussions of these topics can be found on Sullivan on Comp.
Topics: Case Law Updates
To keep Sullivan on Comp up to date on a monthly basis, our team dives into each panel decision and new laws to include an explanation of how each case fits within the workers' compensation scheme. Below is a sampling of this month's updates. Complete discussions of these topics can be found on Sullivan on Comp.
Topics: Case Law Updates
What Qualifies as a Request for a Medical Evaluation Pursuant to Labor Code 4060?
In disputed cases, parties often rush to request a panel QME in a desired specialty. Per Labor Code § 4062.2(b), when an employee is represented by an attorney seeking an evaluation under § 4060, a QME panel may be requested "No earlier than the first working day that is at least 10 days after the date of mailing of a request for a medical evaluation pursuant to Section 4060 ...." The mailbox rule extends this time period for five calendar days if the physical address of the party being served with the first written proposal is within California. But what is a "request for a medical evaluation pursuant to Section 4060"?
Topics: Case Law Updates
Use of the Fifth Amendment in Workers' Compensation
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitutes protects individuals from being forced to testify against themselves. Although the Fifth Amendment itself states that a person shall not "be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself," it has been held that, "It also privileges a person not to answer official questions in any other proceeding, civil or criminal, formal or informal, where he or she reasonably believes the answers might incriminate him or her in a criminal case." (Spielbauer v. County of Santa Clara (2009) 45 Cal. 4th 704, 714.) Accordingly, the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination also is recognized in workers' compensation proceedings.
Topics: Case Law Updates
To keep Sullivan on Comp up to date on a monthly basis, our team dives into each panel decision and new laws to include an explanation of how each case fits within the workers' compensation scheme. Below is a sampling of this month's updates. Complete discussions of these topics can be found on Sullivan on Comp.
Topics: Case Law Updates
To keep Sullivan on Comp up to date on a monthly basis, our team dives into each panel decision and new laws to include an explanation of how each case fits within the workers' compensation scheme. Below is a sampling of this month's updates. Complete discussions of these topics can be found on Sullivan on Comp.
Topics: Case Law Updates
To keep Sullivan on Comp up to date on a monthly basis, our team dives into each panel decision and new laws to include an explanation of how each case fits within the workers' compensation scheme. Below is a sampling of this month's updates. Complete discussions of these topics can be found on Sullivan on Comp.
Topics: Case Law Updates
To keep Sullivan on Comp up to date on a monthly basis, our team dives into each panel decision and new laws to include an explanation of how each case fits within the workers' compensation scheme. Below is a sampling of this month's updates. Complete discussions of these topics can be found on Sullivan on Comp.
Topics: Case Law Updates
To keep Sullivan on Comp up to date on a monthly basis, our team dives into each panel decision and new laws to include an explanation of how each case fits within the workers' compensation scheme. Below is a sampling of this month's updates. Complete discussions of these topics can be found on Sullivan on Comp.
Topics: Case Law Updates
Subscribe Here!
Recent Posts
Posts by Tag
- Case Law Updates (27)
- COVID-19 (11)
- Announcements (10)
- Special Reports (6)
- Red Alerts (4)
- DWC (3)
- Events (3)
- Press Releases (3)
- QME (3)
- cumulative trauma (3)
- Apportionment (2)
- COVID (2)
- California (2)
- Division of Workers' Compensation (2)
- LC 4062.2 (2)
- Laws (2)
- MPN (2)
- Medical Treatment (2)
- Ogilvie (2)
- Permanent Disability (2)
- Petition for Reconsideration (2)
- Reconsideration (2)
- Rules (2)
- Utilization Review (2)
- Workers Compensation (2)
- Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (2)
- permanent total disability (2)
- psychiatric injury (2)
- voucher (2)
- 132a (1)
- 240 Weeks (1)
- 90-day (1)
- AMA Guides (1)
- AME (1)
- Awards (1)
- C&R (1)
- CCR 10396 (1)
- CCR 10607 (1)
- CCR 30 (1)
- CT (1)
- CT injury (1)
- CTE (1)
- Court of Appeals (1)
- Death Benefits (1)
- Defendants (1)
- Earley (1)
- Emergency (1)
- Employee (1)
- Employer (1)
- Evaluations (1)
- FEHA (1)
- Fair Employment and Housing Act (1)
- Fitzpatrick (1)
- Hearings (1)
- IMR (1)
- Insidious Disease (1)
- LC 11663 (1)
- LC 3208.3 (1)
- LC 4616.3 (1)
- LC 4660.1(c) (1)
- LC 4909 (1)
- LC 5410 (1)
- LC 5412 (1)
- LC 5500.5 (1)
- LC 5908.5 (1)
- LC 5909 (1)
- Mailbox Rule (1)
- Mandate (1)
- Medical Evidence (1)
- Medical-Legal (1)
- Multiple (1)
- Objective Evidence (1)
- PTD (1)
- PTP (1)
- Petition (1)
- RFA (1)
- Recon (1)
- Request for Authorization (1)
- Request for a Medical Evaluation (1)
- Romero (1)
- Service (1)
- Special (1)
- Special Adjudication Unit (1)
- Statute of Limitations (1)
- Statutory Presumption (1)
- Striking (1)
- Supplemental Job Displacement Benefit (1)
- Telehealth (1)
- Time (1)
- Trials (1)
- Union (1)
- Urgent Reports (1)
- Vaccine (1)
- Vocational Retraining (1)
- WCAB (1)
- Yanes (1)
- cases (1)
- catastrophic injury (1)
- collateral estoppel (1)
- compensable disability (1)
- credit (1)
- date of injury (1)
- defense (1)
- denial (1)
- discovery (1)
- further study (1)
- multiple employers (1)
- presumption (1)
- proof of service (1)
- qualified medical evaluator (1)
- replacement QME (1)
- res judicata (1)
- return to work voucher (1)
- unpublished opinions (1)
- unrepresented employee (1)
- vocational expert (1)